Thursday, February 19, 2015

Joining and Articulating Spaces

Professor Kevin Hinders
Arch 199KH
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
School of Architecture



“Without rules there is no freedom.”  Leonardo Da Vinci


FORMAL EXERCISE:  Joining & Articulating Spaces


GIVEN:
An enclosed volume, 80’-0” long x 30’-0” wide x 20’-0” high (+ or - 5’-0” in any direction) is cut crosswise by two vertical interior planes, producing a volume flanked by two sets of secondary spaces.  The central volume is equal in height to the given volume, the secondary spaces are divided horizontally by a mezzanine plane about halfway between the top and bottom of the volume.  Object-like compositional elements are to be incorporated:  a stair volume, a chimney volume of approximately 2-1/2 stories, and a passerelle.


OBJECTIVES:
To define the major volume and variously join and articulate the flanking spaces.  All spaces will relate hierarchically (meaning in terms of openness, sequence, light and dark, etc.) to the major volume and to the exterior.

To investigate a given vocabulary.

To study consistency, joining of space, proportion, definition of implied space, spatial transparency, handling of the center vs. the edges of the plane.


CONDITIONS:  (this becomes the vocabulary of the project)

A.  Only straight lines are permissible.  Planes and implied voids are to be angular.

B.   In general, solid angles will exist only by implication (i.e., two solid planes may intersect, three may not).  Exceptions are permitted where exterior planes intersect on top of a horizontal (floor) plane, and possibly (with good reason) the upper corners of the original volume.

C.   Horizontal planes are to be solid, with the exception of minor slots or holes in the top and intermediate (mezzanine) planes.  Refer to condition H for further top plane constraints.

D.   Vertical planes, both exterior and interior, must be at a minimum 33% solid (i.e., 33% of their implied area).

E.   Maximum thickness of planes; vertical 6”, horizontal 1’-0”.

F.   All openings in planes must be cut from the edge:  they must be peripheral to the plane (i.e., no opening may be surrounded on all sides by solid area of the same plane; as with a punched hole).  Exception top plane.

G.  No other major plane may be introduced.  Refer to condition M as well.

H.   No more than 30% of the roof (or top plane) may be open to the sky.

I.    All horizontals must be continuous or have implied continuity.

J.   The chimney “solid” may not be curvilinear and must be wider at the first level than at the second.  This volume may be placed in the central volume or in either of the flanking spaces.

K.   The stair volume must be made as a sloping plane with two solid side rails.  The stairway may not intrude into the major volume unless it vibrates between the two planes.

L.   Two entries must occur:   One into the major volume.
                                                One into one of the flanking spaces.

M.  Although no other major planes than those specified may be introduced, minor plane surfaces may be generated by considering a major plane to have thickness (i.e., a plane is not always skin; it can imply a volume or have apparent mass and weight so that it breaks from the surface of the skin).

      1.   In conjunction with the exterior planes, these planes must generate thickness.

      2.   In conjunction with the fireplace or stair, these planes may generate a shallow zone.


REQUIREMENTS:
This exercise is to be done with 1/8” study models at the outset.


 Note: The design of this project is iterative. It is expected that models should be taken apart, altered and reassembled. New models shall replace older versions as solutions become enriched by the investigation. This is the PROCESS of design. Welcome input, expect changes and strive for excellence!

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

ARCH 199 Architecture and the Built Environment
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA  CHAMPAIGN
ILLINOIS SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE
Term Offered: Spring 2015
Location: Temple Buell Hall, Room 315                                                  
Day and Time: Tuesdays & Thursdays  2-3:20 PM
Credit: 3 hours

Instructor: Kevin Hinders
office: Temple Buell Hall, Room 206
                                                                   

PREMISE AND DESCRIPTION

Office hours:   Tuesday and Thursday 1:00-1:50 PM or by appointment
                                                                       
Course Description
The design of the built environment is both culturally significant and contextually based. It reflects individual creativity and collective values. The purpose of this offering is to provide a greater understanding of the built environment which we move through every day and the complex intertwining of form determinants which weave together to create our surroundings while simultaneously exposing students to the design process.

Course will present Architecture and the Built Environment (including interior design, architecture, landscape architecture, urban design and planning) while concentrating on place making. The components emphasized are the interdependent aspects of culture: design, economics, politics, technology, phenomenology, and tectonics. Therefore this course is built upon the belief that context forms the basis of design and that culture forms the basis of context.

Students will participate in three related aspects of this course: first, a set of guided lecture/walking tours includes venues (such as the campus tunnel system and building mechanical system, University of Illinois Campus ‘culture’ walks, visits to downtown Champaign , Urbana and Campustown, graveyards, Erlanger House, gardens, etc.). Each visit will have a concentration while also discussing the interdependence of aforementioned components. Students will keep a journal of brief personal observations for each excursion; second, students will read and discuss primary and secondary source texts (including Invisible Cities by Italo Calvino); These first two aspects form the basis for personal investigations/design inquiries. Three design exercises at three different scales introduce students to the (architectural) design process where synthesis of information is required to make creative, artistic work, primarily in model form (no previous modeling experience necessary).

Required Texts:       
-I. Calvino, Invisible Cities (1972)
           
Grade Breakdown:
Trip Participation (20%) includes a journal entry per site visit.
We will discuss this one the first day of class as to the best vehicle for your entries.
Discussion Participation (20%)
Design Assignments (60%; 20% each)           
Course Grade
Letter grades for this course are established as follows:
Excellent (A+, A, A-): Student’s work is of exceptional quality, and solutions to the problems show a depth of understanding of the project requirements. Project is fully developed and presented well, both graphically and orally. Student has developed a strong and appropriate concept that clearly enhances the overall solution. The full potential of the problem has been realized and demonstrated.

Good (B+, B, B-): Student’s work shows above-average understanding and clear potential. All project requirements are fulfilled and are clearly and concisely presented.

Fair (C+, C, C-): Student’s work meets minimum course objectives and solves major problem requirements. Work shows normal understanding. Quality of project, as well as the development of knowledge and skills, is average.

Poor (D+, D, D-): Student’s work shows limited understanding and/or effort. Minimum problem requirements have not been met. Quality of project, as well as development of skills, is below average. This is the lowest passing grade.

Failure (F): Student’s work is unresolved, incomplete and/or unclear. Minimum course objectives or project requirements are not met, and student’s work shows lack of understanding and/or effort. Quality of project or performance is not acceptable. This grade is not acceptable for degree credit.


Preparation for Class
1.      Students shall be prepared for each class period. Faculty shall not accept a student’s verbal explanation of a concept without supporting visual material as a basis for design criticism. To that end, an instructor shall not engage in critique of a student’s work without two and/or three dimensional evidence of the development of a design, be it in a desk crit, pin-up, or review. A student should not expect to receive design critiques unless clear development of the project has been made since previous discussions.
2.      Faculty shall engage in dialogue with students to facilitate the development of students’ design ideas.
3.      The critic’s role is to extend a student’s thinking and challenge a student to explore and substantiate his/her design. Critiques will prompt students to explore an in-depth understanding of the ramifications of design concepts and their development.

School Policy on Attendance:
1. Attendance is required at all classes and all required external events. Unexcused absences equaling the number of one week’s class meetings will result in a full letter grade reduction for the semester (e.g.: three absences for a three time a week class, two for a two time a week class, etc.). Any additional unexcused absence beyond this amount will result in a failing grade.
3. Students must attend all classes, reviews, pin ups, lectures, field trips, etc. in their entirety. If a student arrives late or leaves early, without the consent of the instructor, (s)he is considered absent for the entire class. Repeated patterns of late arrival or early departure will be noted and considered as unexcused absences.
4. An absence may be excused for medical emergencies or family emergencies only. These emergencies must be supported by proper documentation, such as a doctor's note on letterhead or an obituary. The student is responsible for providing proper documentation for the absence to the instructor, and must do so prior to the end of the current semester. The student is also solely responsible for arranging for materials, etc. from a class (s)he has missed.
5. An absence will not be considered an excused absence if it is for any other reason including: work, vacation, or computer failure.
6. Students who wish to observe their religious holidays shall notify the faculty member by the tenth day of the semester of the date when they will be absent unless the religious holiday is observed on or before the tenth day of the semester. In such cases, the student shall notify the faculty member at least five days in advance of the date when he/she will be absent.
7. Attendance is required at all scheduled studio reviews for the full time period of the reviews.

This is theISoA's Policy - You will get 2 unexcused absenses for Arch 199 but all required work will need to be completed.

Late Work
All assignments are due at the specified date and time indicated by the instructor. Deadlines for assignments will be strictly enforced, with late work resulting in grade penalties as follows:
1. Work submitted late (after the assigned deadline, but within 24 hours) shall be penalized one full letter grade (from B+ to C+, for example).
2. Work submitted more than 24 hours late shall be penalized two full letter grades (from B+ to D+, for example).
3. Work submitted more than 48 hours late is not acceptable and may receive a failing grade.
4. Students must have all presentation materials prepared and displayed on time for reviews. Missing a scheduled presentation time and/or not presenting at a project review without approval from the instructor is the equivalent of missing an exam, and shall be graded accordingly.

This syllabus is for general use. The instructor reserves the right to alter syllabus content as needed throughout the semester. Written notice via email and/or verbal announcement will serve to alert students to any alteration in the syllabus. Since the weather in Champaign is unpredictable please come to class prepared to go on site visits even if not listed in the syllabus. We will take advantage of opportunities as they present themselves. Also note- the instructor will be away from campus Jan.29- Feb 6. Visits and course material has been arranged for these dates. You shall arrive promptly at the assigned venues on these dates.
.



Schedule of class meetings and readings (2-day per week schedule) NOTE: due to weather and scheduling of events tours may be altered. The instructor will notify students via email and/or written variation to the syllabus as needed.

Week 1- January 20 &22: Introduction
1-Tour – The South Quad: From Stock Pavilion to Foellinger Auditorium
2-Lecture/Discussion: What is Architecture? (tour the Architecture Building)
            Reading Assignment: Experiencing Architecture (pages 1-6)
- Assignment 1- The Creation of a Threshold ( due Week 4)

Week 2- January 27 & 29: The Making of Place
1-Tour- The Main Quad/ Engineering Quad
2- Tour Power Plant- How Things Work, Part 1: Mechanical Systems Instructor Away
Tour- Arranged with Facilities and Services Power plant on Oak Street- Go to Abbott Power Plant at Gregory and Oak - SOUTH ENTRANCE

Week 3- February 3 & 5: Instructor Away
1- Self led Tour/Scavenger Hunt- Looking for Columns, the role of the past in the creation of the present
Students are to explore campus and find the following orders- teams of 2 or 3 people: One hour time limit!
Ionic, Doric, Corinthian, Composite and Tuscan- use whatever means you have to determine what these orders are and look like. Teams MUST SPLIT UP! Photo document at LEAST one of each order with one or more of you hugging the column then upload photos in a word document to the Arch 199 Folder. Use YOUR NAMES /Columns as the title of the Word document.
2- Tour of Krannert Center for the Performing Arts - led by a guide >show up at the ticket office

Week 4- Febraury 10 & 12:
1- How Things Work, Part 2: Mechanical Systems
Tour- Temple Hoyne Buell Mechanical Systems
2- Assignment 1- The Creation of a Threshold DUE
Reading Assignment, Invisible Cities (pages 1-39)

Week 5- February 17 & 19: How Things Work, Part 3: Structural Systems
1-Tour- Armory, Huff and the Football Practice Facility
2--Assignment 2- The Creation of Place (within the rules)- the Shoebox project” 
Discuss Reading Assignment, Invisible Cities (pages 1-39)

Week 6- February 24 & 26 : The Making of Place, Domesticity
1-Tour- Erlanger house- confirmed 2-3:30
2- Discussion of Reading Assignment
-Assignment 2- The Creation of Place (within the rules)- the Shoebox project” 

Week 7- March 3 & 5: Sustainability, LEED and Conservation
1-Tour- Business Instructional Facility (BIF)
2-Discussion of Reading Assignment
Studio Preliminary Review of Assignment 2 - The Creation of Place (within the rules)- the Shoebox project” 

Week 8- March 10 & 12: The United States Continental Grid and the Making of Place in America
1-Tour- Downtown Champaign
2-Tour- Downtown Urbana OR Tour- Campustown (Politics and the Public Realm)

Week 9- March 17& 19: : ‘The Dead and Living’: Landscape
1-Tour – The Mount Hope Cemetery
2-In- Studio FINAL Review of Assignment 2 - the Creation of Place (within the rules)- the Shoebox project” 
            Reading Assignment: Excerpts from Invisible Cities- Students to determine from pages 39- 163
            -Assignment 3: The Depiction of an Idea- An Invisible City Made Visible (and edible)

Week 10 March 31 & April 2 Constructing the Edifice
1-Tour-  Building Construction Site (under construction)- TBD with Facilities and Services
2-Review: Groups 1  and 2 of Assignment 3: The Depiction of an Idea- An Invisible City Made Visible (and edible)

Week 11 April 7 & 9: Precedents in Architecture; Part 1
1-Tour- Campus Buildings and the search for meaning        
2-Preliminary review of Assignment 3- The Depiction of an Idea- An Invisible City Made Visible (and edible) -“desk critiques”

Week 12 April 14 & 16: Precedents in Architecture; Part 2
1-Tour-  Education Building & garden along with places of interest- a student ‘led’ tour
2-Review: Groups 1  and 2 of Assignment 3: The Depiction of an Idea- An Invisible City Made Visible (and edible)

Week 13- April 21 & 23: Small Towns and the Rural Landscapes
1-Tour- Philo, IL (requires the use of a University vehicle)
2-Review: Groups 3 and 4 of Assignment 3: The Depiction of an Idea- An Invisible City Made Visible (and edible)

Week 14- April 28 &30: Phenomenology and the Poetics of Space
1-Review Groups 1 Assignment 3: The Depiction of an Idea- An Invisible City Made Visible (and edible)
2- Review Groups 2 Assignment 3: The Depiction of an Idea- An Invisible City Made Visible (and edible)


Week 15- May 5- Conclusion - General discussion, Turn in Journals, ICES, etc.

http://www.vandijkarchitects.com/media/uploads/Experiencing_Architecture.pdf

http://www.vandijkarchitects.com/media/uploads/Experiencing_Architecture.pdf